Blog #317 Why Migrant Muslims Seek Western Countries
By John Shoemaker
I could not agree more with the Quora comments by Ajax (see below) about WHY Migrant Muslims seek Western countries. You don’t see such Muslims trying to move to other Islamic countries in massive numbers because they know there is no change from a terrible lifestyle. They also love the idea that Western nations seem to be ruled by left liberal attitudes that give them free stuff out of some kind of faux virtue. They don’t have to develop skills, study (except the Koran), work hard, or take risks. They are basically freeloaders, lazy, itinerant, untrustworthy, thieving, and scheming liars. It is laughable to consider any of them entrepreneurs who want to build something rather than destroy it.
Too many of them violate the sense and reasonable values of good, law-abiding Muslims.
Note, many of the Migrant Muslims are young MEN. They have no future, and so they create mayhem, steal, and have joy in violence.
Most Islamic countries are broken societies.
Muslims want to be supported by the government on the backs of taxpayers who they have no respect for and laugh at them. Also, it is made worse by their practice of having high numbers of children, 10 or more kids, which justifies why the male head of household does not have to work.
The West is nothing more than suckers to Islamic migration. Everyone knows that Muslims have serious problems assimilating, have no time for work, expect Sharia Law to rule the land, and many of the other customs that have broken Islamic countries which have no natural resources like Oil and Gas. Innovation is absent. Economic growth stagnates unless they have abundant natural resources like minerals, fossil fuels, rare earths, or precious metals. They sell those to Western countries; otherwise, they produce little GNP. So, with a terrible standard of living, they want to move to Western countries to take advantage of their stupidity and crazy generosity.
Worse, many are RADICALIZED and will bring violence to take over the government and outlaw other religions, laws, and western values. Wives and women have no rights. Dogs are killed. Muslims can marry infant girls. If you are an infidel, as we see in many Islamic Caliphates, you will be ostracized, if not a target for killing. Remember, they have no respect for Western history and therefore have no feeling when burning down historic sites.
Most western citizens have no idea what Sharia Law is or means for them.
In the end, when they increase in numbers, totally disrespect laws, and consider women good for raping (see what happened in Sweden), they want to take over and establish their own culture with no-go zones while crime spikes. France invited their problems by allowing millions of Muslims to migrate into their country. Note that France already provides free healthcare, childcare, welfare, housing, schools, colleges, and more. Yet, they want more! If they don’t get it, they will steal it or burn it down.
If they get their way, Migrant Muslims will break the societies of Western countries by rejecting our values, our laws, and our way of life.
There will be no peace.
It is tragic, and the consequences are horrific.
——————————————————————————————————————-
From Quora… AJAX…
A key reason why Muslim choose to immigrant to non Muslim ( Western Christian countries ) instead of a Islamic countries ( remember that there are not one or two but 57 Islamic countries) is because those countries are peaceful, prospered, well ordered, with freedom of speech, religion, expression and conscience, the rule of law, have good infrastructure ( roads, railway medical services, school etc ) and a thriving economy which isn't cursed with rampant incompetence and corruption.
Muslim countries are invariably economic and social basket cases. The sad thing is wherever Muslim congregate they turn those areas into replicas of the place they have left.
If you disagree please feel free to give examples of successful Muslim countries, especially those with “Freedom of religion” for all.
The problem is not they migrant but that they don't integrate and have conquering mentality.
——————————————————————————————————————
From Harvard, a left liberal view….
_________________________
Claire Adida | David Laitin | Marie-Anne Valfort
2016
Harvard University Press
Amid mounting fears of violent Islamic extremism, many Europeans ask whether Muslim immigrants can integrate into historically Christian countries. In a groundbreaking ethnographic investigation of France’s Muslim migrant population, Why Muslim Integration Fails in Christian-Heritage Societies explores this complex question. The authors conclude that both Muslim and non-Muslim French must share responsibility for the slow progress of Muslim integration.
Claire Adida, David Laitin, and Marie-Anne Valfort found that in France, Muslims are widely perceived as threatening, based in large part on cultural differences between Muslim and rooted French that feed both rational and irrational Islamophobia. Relying on a unique methodology to isolate the religious component of discrimination, the authors identify a discriminatory equilibrium in which both Muslim immigrants and native French act negatively toward one another in a self-perpetuating, vicious circle.
Disentangling the rational and irrational threads of Islamophobia is essential if Europe hopes to repair a social fabric that has frayed around the issue of Muslim immigration. Muslim immigrants must address their own responsibility for the failures of integration, and Europeans must acknowledge the anti-Islam sentiments at the root of their antagonism. The authors outline public policy solutions aimed at promoting religious diversity in fair-minded host societies.
Why Muslim Integration Fails in Christian-Heritage Societies — Harvard University Press