Blog #233 Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is biased. America suffers as a result.
Miranda Devine: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson removed any shred of impartiality by applauding anti-ICE speeches at the Grammys
Published Feb. 4, 2026
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson continues to dismay.
Her attendance at the rancidly partisan anti-ICE Grammy Awards on Sunday was a joke.
The 55-year-old Biden DEI candidate was nominated for a Grammy for narrating the audiobook of her memoir “Lovely One,” which she unashamedly believes herself to be.
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Queen Latifah attend the 68th GrammyAwards on February 1, 2026, in Los Angeles, California.Getty Images for The Recording A
But she should have stayed home rather than laughing and clapping in the audience with a bunch of virtue-signaling luvvies ranting “F–k ICE” every time they got on stage.
It should have been obvious to Jackson that the event would be politically charged.
More From Miranda Devine
Miranda Devine: ‘Melania’ serves as a dainty middle finger to Trump’s media tormenters — who were wrong about everything
Miranda Devine: Hunter Biden’s latest debacle shows that he can’t stay out of the ‘lamelight’
Miranda Devine: More martyrs for cynical Dems after fatal Alex Pretti shooting
She has to sit in judgment on various Trump administration immigration enforcement cases.
How can she be seen as impartial?
The answer is: She can’t, any more than she can be impartial on transgender-related cases after she refused to “define” a woman during her 2022 Senate confirmation.
“I’m not a biologist,” she replied to Sen. Marsha Blackburn’s (R-Tenn.) question, possibly the most embarrassing answer ever provided to Congress by a judicial nominee.
Using the same rule book Democrats have used in their prolonged attacks on conservative-leaning justices, Jackson should recuse herself from all immigration cases due to her enthusiastic involvement in the anti-ICE Grammys.
Left’s double standard
After all, the left has waged a years-long campaign to get Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito thrown off the court for such sins as holidaying with a friend who happens to be wealthy, in Thomas’ case, or in Alito’s, having a wife who flew a patriotic flag outside their home.
Liberals are sticklers about the appearance of propriety — but only for their perceived ideological opponents.
Of course, Jackson won’t recuse herself or endure any effective undermining from Republicans despite the fact that she is a left-wing activist in judicial robes, who gabs inanely during oral arguments and writes nonsensical dissents attacking her fellow justices.
The real problem with Jackson is her inability to think logically or in any way that departs from the liberal soup that she has swum in her entire privileged life.
It’s not really her fault that she’s in this position.
She doesn’t know any better, having been told all her life how special she is, when she appears not to be anything but a diligent girl who has followed a golden path.
Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington on ‘Pod Force One.’ Subscribe here!